In the classic case Palsgraf v.Long Island Railroad (1928) ,the court denied Mrs.Palsgraf's claim of negligence on the ground that her injuries were __________,therefore the railroad employee's actions were not __________ of her injuries.
A) not foreseeable; a proximate cause
B) not foreseeable; an actual cause
C) the actual cause; representative
D) not foreseeable; the intentional factor in the claim
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q48: Which of the following is true regarding
Q49: CASE 9.1,Kubert v.Best (2013)examined the question of
Q50: Which of the following is the best
Q51: Define and differentiate between compensatory damages and
Q52: A court order prohibiting a defendant from
Q53: Billie,a student at State University,needed a way
Q54: Under the doctrine of _,the plaintiff may
Q55: Under the doctrine of _ liability,once the
Q56: The Smiths are landscaping their backyard to
Q57: Blastco is an expert demolition company.During the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents