You are the judge hearing a Motion for Summary judgment filed by an employer in the case of an employee who has been terminated. The employee was the sole African-American customer service representative at the firm, who had a lengthy record of good evaluations. However, she received more negative evaluations over a period of three years after a new supervisor was hired, though the more stringent requirements applied to her were not applied to white employees. After 3 years, the employee was then selected for termination in a downsizing based on the previous 3 years evaluations. Based on this evidence, what should you decide?
A) you should grant summary judgment for the employer because the termination was based on performance appraisals rather than race
B) you should grant summary judgment for the employer because a discrimination claim based on performance appraisals going back three years was no longer timely
C) you should allow the employee to go to trial because African-Americans disproportionately received low performance ratings in this company
D) you should allow the employee to go to trial because the termination was based on performance appraisals that were tainted by consideration of the employee s race
E) none of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: The forced distribution method regarding performance appraisals
Q6: A 360 degree appraisal:
A)is conducted by the
Q7: Regarding the language to be used in
Q9: In Metty v Motorola, , a high-level
Q11: In Hoffman v. Caterpillar , a disabled
Q12: Which of the following is true regarding
Q13: Under the ADA,performance appraisals for disabled persons:
A)cannot
Q14: You are the crew supervisor of a
Q14: In question # 3 above, evidence is
Q17: The most common performance criteria used includes
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents