In question # 3 above, evidence is introduced that the statute of limitations for filing an EEOC claim is 300 days in the state where the case was filed. Since the performance appraisals which were allegedly tainted by race were issued more than 300 years before the case was filed, the employer moves to dismiss the case, arguing that the statute of limitations has passed, the case has been filed too late. Based on this evidence, what should you decide?
A) the case should be dismissed because the statute of limitations has passed, and the case was filed too late
B) the case should be dismissed because the tainted evaluations triggered the employee s right to file a cause of action, and the case should have been filed within 300 days of the first tainted performance appraisal
C) the Motion to Dismiss should be denied because the employee s right to file a cause of action accrued when she was terminated, and not when a tainted performance evaluation was created
D) the Motion to Dismiss should be denied because the case of a termination based on tainted performance evaluations may be filed at any time
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: A 360 degree appraisal:
A)is conducted by the
Q7: Regarding the language to be used in
Q9: In Metty v Motorola, , a high-level
Q9: Under Title VII,in cases of discrimination,punitive damages
Q11: In Hoffman v. Caterpillar , a disabled
Q12: You are the judge hearing a Motion
Q12: Which of the following is true regarding
Q13: Under the ADA,performance appraisals for disabled persons:
A)cannot
Q17: The most common performance criteria used includes
Q18: OSHA's hazard communication standard requires:
A)specific content and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents