In Treibacher Industrie v.Allegheny Technologies,involving a dispute over the sale of powered metal from Treibacher of Austria to Allegheny of the U.S. ,Allegheny suddenly cancelled its order,forcing Treibacher to suffer a loss.It sued under the CISG.The appeals court held that under the CISG the court requires the parties to follow the written words of the contract;since they covered this matter,Allegheny had the right to cancel without penalty.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The CISG generally requires parties to adhere to the terms of the contract, but it also considers the intent and practices of the parties, as well as trade usages. The appeals court would not automatically allow cancellation without penalty if it contradicts the contract's terms or established practices.

In Treibacher Industrie V