Mr.Johnson,a white male,testified for the plaintiffs in a racial discrimination lawsuit brought by a Black female employee against his employer,Security Bank.He had been advised by his manager not to get involved.Shortly thereafter,Mr.Johnson was fired.
A) Mr.Johnson has no case for retaliatory discharge because he is not a member of the protected class.
B) Mr.Johnson has no case for retaliatory discharge because merely testifying on behalf of someone else is insufficient involvement in a discrimination lawsuit to get protection against retaliatory discharge under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
C) Mr.Johnson has no case for retaliatory discharge because he is an employment-at-will employee.
D) Mr.Johnson may have a case because Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects an employee who participates in any manner in an investigation,proceeding or hearing on a colleague's complaint of discrimination.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: Davis Hosiery Mills has each new employee
Q4: ABC,Inc.solicited bids from various independent contractors to
Q10: Under the economic realities test, courts consider
Q11: Colton Manufacturing shut down 3 manufacturing facilities
Q12: Regulations governing the employer-employee relationship are based
Q12: Hannah Bing was hired by Friendly Catering
Q15: Mr. Jones was employed by Barker Sock
Q17: Cortney was employed at Brunson County Elementary
Q18: The employment-at-will doctrine means that
A) An actor
Q19: A signed agreement between a company and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents