SFAS No.109 rejected the approach of its predecessor SFAS No.96 regarding the classification of deferred tax assets and liabilities on the balance sheet.SFAS No.96 required that the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences that will result in taxable or deductible amounts during the following year or operating cycle (if longer than one year)be classified as current.SFAS No.109 requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified based on the asset or liability to which the temporary difference relates or,if no clear relationship between the temporary difference and an asset or liability can be established,based on the date on which the deferred tax item will be realized or settled.
Required:
Explain why the FASB rejected the approach in SFAS No.96 and the basis for the method required in SFAS No.109.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q77: Allsgood Appliances computed a pretax financial loss
Q78: Eva Designs,Inc.,a corporation organized on January 1,2005,reported
Q79: Seymour Associates computed a pretax financial income
Q80: Mostel Company has each of the following
Q81: SFAS No.109 uses the term "tax-planning strategy".The
Q82: The Montoya Corporation reports the following differences
Q83: Eastwood Manufacturing planned to claim a $10,000
Q84: SFAS No 109 takes a decidedly different
Q86: IAS No.12,"Income Taxes," contains the provisions relating
Q87: SFAS No.109 allows the recognition of deferred
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents