Additional Case 6.1
Central Enterprises is suffering an economic downturn, and the workforce needs to be reduced. Upper-level managers are debating the costs and benefits of various employee separations. Brian argues that the company needs to make immediate cuts to both management and labor. The cuts need to be made in such a way that the scope of the company and its markets are not affected. The firm needs to do more with fewer people according to Brian.
Other managers want to take a long-term, less traumatic approach. According to Natalie, the firm has time to consider the problems and gradually reduce the workforce rather than making sudden staff cuts. Natalie points out that 35% of the workforce is over age 62.
The VP of HR, LaTisha, wants the least disruptive reduction process possible. LaTisha just finished a major labor negotiation with the union and is not ready for another. She points out that turnover has been fairly high. Along with considering workforce reductions, LaTisha wants to know why people are leaving the company voluntarily.
-Refer to Additional Case 6.1.Which of the following layoff alternatives would LaTisha most likely support?
A) Implementing a hiring freeze
B) Instituting pay cuts
C) Offering job sharing
D) Retraining workers
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q100: Transferring and relocating employees are both ways
Q101: The use of performance as a layoff
Q102: York Enterprises is a unionized firm on
Q103: The use of seniority as a layoff
Q104: Management can most likely minimize problems with
Q106: According to the WARN Act,which of the
Q107: As the head of the HR department
Q108: Critics of the WARN Act argue that
Q109: Workers of companies with over 100 employees
Q110: The information given in the initial meeting
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents