In particular,technological change seems to have proven ill- adapted to collective bargaining perhaps because it is fundamentally incompatible with it).The aim of collective bargaining is to fix terms and conditions of employment for a set period,while the effect if not the aim of technological change is to destabilize conditions.Arbitrators and labour boards have proven very reluctant to enforce tech change provisions and legislation; unions have often been reluctant to negotiate them.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q47: The excessively legalistic interpretation of such agreements,particularly
Q48: Even the most detailed agreement can't cover
Q49: The best way to reduce strikes in
Q50: List the various types of wage and
Q51: Consolidation is usually the quickest stage.
Q53: Egalitarian provisions are rare in Canada and
Q54: Because collective agreement provisions are often so
Q55: Explain why union- management negotiations are almost
Q56: Social contract outcomes are a type of
Q57: More generally,it isn't clear how well collective
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents