According to the Supreme Court opinion in Herring v.U.S.(2009),involving a search pursuant to an active arrest warrant that was later discovered to have been recalled several months earlier:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In the Herring v. U.S. case, the Supreme Court ruled that evidence seized pursuant to a search based on an active arrest warrant that was later discovered to have been recalled several months earlier is admissible if the police acted objectively, in reasonably good faith, and the error in record keeping was negligent but not reckless. This means that if the officers believed they were acting lawfully and the mistake was not reckless, the evidence obtained can be used in court. Therefore, choice D is the correct answer.

According to the Supreme Court Opinion in Herring V