According to the Supreme Court in Mapp v.Ohio,leaving the Fourth Amendment's protection from illegal
searches and seizures to solutions other than the exclusionary rule had been effective.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court in Mapp v. Ohio ruled that the exclusionary rule was necessary to enforce the protections of the Fourth Amendment, and that other solutions had not been effective enough to deter unconstitutional searches and seizures.

According to the Supreme Court in Mapp V