In Herring v.U.S.(2009)the court held that if an officer makes an arrest,reasonably (but wrongly)believing there's an outstanding arrest warrant against the suspect,the arrest violates the Fourth Amendment but evidence obtained during a search incident to the unlawful arrest is admissible in court.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In Herring v.U.S.(2009)the court held that if an officer makes an arrest,reasonably (but wrongly)believing there's an outstanding arrest warrant against the suspect,the arrest violates the Fourth Amendment but evidence obtained during a search incident to the unlawful arrest is admissible in court.

In Herring V