In Arizona v.Gant (2009) ,the Supreme Court ruled:
A) when a police officer makes a lawful custodial arrest of an occupant of an automobile,he may always search the passenger compartment.
B) police may search a vehicle incident to an occupant's arrest only if the arrestee is within reaching distance of the passenger compartment at the time of the search or it's reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence related to the offense of arrest.
C) police may search a vehicle's passenger compartment incident to a lawful custodial arrest of an occupant if they have probable cause to search.
D) police must rely on inventory searches in order to search the passenger compartment of a vehicle.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: Concerning pretext searches:
A)the Supreme Court has decided
Q19: The following are all examples of emergency
Q20: The countervailing law enforcement interests against "noknock"
Q21: In the case of Wilson v Arkansas
Q25: Police officers at the scene of a
Q26: What do the police need to articulate
Q27: Which of the following would NOT justify
Q28: The vehicle exception to the warrant requirement
Q32: Concerning third-party consent to search, in which
Q40: The scope of a search incident to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents