The Supreme Court has ruled that a state statute which permits police to require a suspect disclose his identity during a Terry stop or face prosecution for failing to answer:
A) is unconstitutional because people are not obliged to respond to an officer's questions.
B) is unconstitutional because it violates the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
C) is constitutional because it is rationally related to the purpose and practical demands of a Terry stop.
D) is constitutional only if the state supreme court has ruled that it is.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: Which of the following will not support
Q7: Which of the following constitutes a stop?
A)A
Q20: According to the Supreme Court opinion in
Q21: Categorical suspicion:
A)can be sufficient in itself
Q21: According to the Supreme Court in Michigan
Q22: According to the Supreme Court opinion in
Q29: In Maryland v.Wilson,the case where police removed
Q30: Outer clothing pat-downs do not constitute Fourth
Q37: According to the Supreme Court's opinion in
Q40: In U.S.v.Sokolow,involving the stop of a suspected
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents