
In theHolcomb v.Iona College case referenced in the text,a white assistant coach of a college basketball team alleged he was fired because he was married to an African American woman,and sued the college for violation of Title VII.How did the court rule?
A) The court ruled that Title VII was inapplicable to such claims.
B) The court ruled that Title VII was inapplicable because a private college, as opposed to a public college, was involved.
C) The court ruled that Title VII protects the parties involved in a racially mixed marriage, but that in other situations, such as dating relationships, Title VII would not apply.
D) The court ruled that Title VII protects employees from discrimination based on their association with a person of a different race.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q12: A claim for sexual harassment may be
Q22: Title VII prohibits discrimination based on which
Q23: An employee may use the Family and
Q25: Which of the following is generally true
Q26: What is the major provision of the
Q27: In theInternational Union United Automobile,Aerospace & Agriculture
Q28: Which of the following is true regarding
Q30: Which of the following must the plaintiff
Q34: Under federal law,employees may not waive their
Q40: What is the major provision of the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents