In Berger v.New York (1967) the issue was the constitutionality of a New York statute that authorized electronic surveillance pursuant to a judicial warrant.In the case,the Court:
A) validated the law because the government had probable cause and the intrusion was reasonably related to what the government official was looking for
B) validated the law because it properly limited the nature, scope, or duration of the electronic surveillance
C) invalidated the law because the government did not establish probable cause
D) invalidated the law because it failed to properly limit the nature, scope, or duration of the electronic surveillance
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A _ allows for interception of a
Q3: Which of the following is a true
Q3: Under the exigent circumstances exception, a law
Q4: Putting material _ means it is not
Q5: _ concerns the use of scientific methods
Q6: Regarding Title III,a(n)_ person means a "person
Q8: The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)authorizes courts
Q9: When one party to a communication consents
Q10: In Olmstead v.United States (1928),the Court held
Q11: In the case of Olmstead v.United States
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents