In Wolf v. Colorado, the U.S. Supreme was called on to address whether evidence seized in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments could be used in state court and held that:
A) The exclusionary rule that applied to defendants in federal court also applied to defendants in state court.
B) The exclusionary rule was an explicit requirement of the Fourth Amendment and equally applicable to the state and federal courts.
C) The exclusionary rule was a judiciary creation to expedite the trial process.
D) State courts were not required to exclude from trial evidence that was seized in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: _ is evidence that is obtained as
Q2: The exclusionary rule was established by the
Q3: In _ the U.S. Supreme Court, held
Q5: In Rochin v. California, the U.S. Supreme
Q6: Which of the following statements is true
Q7: In the 1961 case Mapp v. Ohio,
Q8: Arguments in support of the exclusionary rule
Q9: The impact of excluding evidence seized during
Q10: Federal Agent Smith needs additional evidence to
Q11: Federal Agent Smith needs additional evidence to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents