Arguments in support of the exclusionary rule include:
A) Failure to recognize the constitutional status of the exclusionary rule serves to grant the right but in reality to withhold its privilege and enjoyment.
B) The exclusionary rule is designed to repair past violations, not to prevent future violations.
C) The protection against unreasonable searches and seizures would be seriously weakened if evidence seized in an unreasonable search cannot be used against an accused at trial.
D) All of the above are correct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q3: In _ the U.S. Supreme Court, held
Q4: In Wolf v. Colorado, the U.S. Supreme
Q5: In Rochin v. California, the U.S. Supreme
Q6: Which of the following statements is true
Q7: In the 1961 case Mapp v. Ohio,
Q9: The impact of excluding evidence seized during
Q10: Federal Agent Smith needs additional evidence to
Q11: Federal Agent Smith needs additional evidence to
Q12: Which of the following statements represents an
Q13: Suggested alternate remedies to the exclusionary rule
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents