Which of the following statements represents an argument against the exclusionary rule?
A) The prosecution, not the police officer, feels the immediate impact of the exclusionary rule making the purported deterrent effect on police officers a "wistful dream."
B) The impact of the exclusionary rule will be felt on the judiciary who will suffer decreased respect as a result of having to take the side of the victim.
C) The exclusionary rule undermines the purpose of the criminal trial process, where the determination of guilt or innocence is based on available and reliable evidence.
D) Both a and c are correct.
E) All of the above are correct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: In the 1961 case Mapp v. Ohio,
Q8: Arguments in support of the exclusionary rule
Q9: The impact of excluding evidence seized during
Q10: Federal Agent Smith needs additional evidence to
Q11: Federal Agent Smith needs additional evidence to
Q13: Suggested alternate remedies to the exclusionary rule
Q14: The _ is a practice where federal
Q15: The first step taken when challenging the
Q16: If a pretrial motion to suppress evidence
Q17: In a pretrial challenge to a search
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents