The impact of excluding evidence seized during an unreasonable search is:
A) The cost of excluding evidence has led to a large proportion of cases ending in acquittals.
B) The cost of excluding evidence has led police departments to stress the importance of police professionalism.
C) The cost of excluding evidence has led police department to add training programs to help police officers legally circumvent the Fourth Amendment.
D) All of the above are correct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: In Wolf v. Colorado, the U.S. Supreme
Q5: In Rochin v. California, the U.S. Supreme
Q6: Which of the following statements is true
Q7: In the 1961 case Mapp v. Ohio,
Q8: Arguments in support of the exclusionary rule
Q10: Federal Agent Smith needs additional evidence to
Q11: Federal Agent Smith needs additional evidence to
Q12: Which of the following statements represents an
Q13: Suggested alternate remedies to the exclusionary rule
Q14: The _ is a practice where federal
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents