In 2003,the Supreme Court revisited the use of affirmative action by the University of Michigan and ruled that
A) race could not be used under any circumstances as a consideration in admitting students.
B) race could not be used by any public college or university, but could be considered by private colleges and universities.
C) persistent patterns of social discrimination still legitimized the use of race as a "plus factor" when deciding to admit students.
D) a school's interest in diversity permitted the use of race as one factor in university admissions, as long as all applicants were judged individually on their merits.
E) race could only be used as long as a fixed system was employed, such as adding a predetermined number of points to an applicant's score, a method that minimized arbitrary discretion by admissions offices.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q46: Preferential policies are
A)seldom explicitly legislated.
B)strictly prohibited by
Q47: What is the major rationale for affirmative
Q48: Why did the women's suffrage movement aim
Q49: Recent new justices on the Supreme Court
Q50: Allan Bakke's application to the University of
Q52: A U.S.Supreme Court decision in 2007 made it
Q53: _ is the idea that employers should
Q54: People who feel that they were unfairly
Q55: What women's rights activist first persuaded a
Q56: Demands for women's rights were born in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents