In the case of United States v. Leon, a judge, after evaluating all of the evidence, issued a facially valid search warrant. Police officers, acting in good faith, executed the warrant and found large quantities of drugs. The warrant was later determined to be invalid due to insufficient probable cause. What was the opinion of the Supreme Court concerning the admissibility of the evidence obtained by the officers? What was the rationale of the Court in reaching its conclusion? What was the rule established in that case?
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q22: In a federal prosecution, when there is
Q23: What is the provision of the Constitution
Q24: There are two provisions of the Constitution
Q25: What provisions of the Bill of Rights
Q26: State the rule relating to the right
Q28: The defendant in the case of Georgia
Q29: In the case of Horton v. California,
Q30: The rationale for excluding evidence obtained in
Q31: Additional support for excluding evidence seized in
Q32: The rule of law that prohibits the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents