In the case of Horton v. California, a police officer prepared an affidavit for a search warrant, which referred to the proceeds of a robbery and weapons. The warrant issued by the magistrate authorized only a search for the proceeds. While executing the search warrant the officer seized weapons in plain view. Was the seizure of the weapons justified under the warrant? What was the Supreme Court's decision concerning the requirement that the discovery of evidence in plain view be "inadvertent"? What are the two conditions that must be satisfied in order for a plain view seizure to be valid?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In the case of Horton v. California, a police officer prepared an affidavit for a search warrant, which referred to the proceeds of a robbery and weapons. The warrant issued by the magistrate authorized only a search for the proceeds. While executing the search warrant the officer seized weapons in plain view. Was the seizure of the weapons justified under the warrant? What was the Supreme Court's decision concerning the requirement that the discovery of evidence in plain view be "inadvertent"? What are the two conditions that must be satisfied in order for a plain view seizure to be valid?

In the Case of Horton V