The rationale for excluding evidence obtained in violation of the Constitution is that:
A) such evidence is not relevant or material.
B) if such evidence would not be excluded, that fact would provide an incentive for police to affirmatively commit violations of individual constitutional rights.
C) a jury would place little weight on such evidence because force was used in obtaining it.
D) the Constitution of the United States expressly prohibits the use of such evidence.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: What provisions of the Bill of Rights
Q26: State the rule relating to the right
Q27: In the case of United States v.
Q28: The defendant in the case of Georgia
Q29: In the case of Horton v. California,
Q31: Additional support for excluding evidence seized in
Q32: The rule of law that prohibits the
Q33: Supreme Court rulings that exclude evidence for
Q34: When evidence has been illegally obtained in
Q35: The Fourth Amendment to the United States
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents