When evidence has been illegally obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the exclusionary rule may be applied to keep the evidence from admission in court:
A) but a trial court may later determine that the violation was not outrageous and refuse to enforce the exclusionary rule.
B) but the trial court may choose to sanction the police officers personally for their violation of the Fourth Amendment rights of a suspect.
C) and the illegally seized evidence cannot be used as a source to discover "derivative evidence" suggested by the illegally seized evidence.
D) however, other evidence that was discovered as "derivative evidence" from the illegally seized evidence is admissible in court.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q29: In the case of Horton v. California,
Q30: The rationale for excluding evidence obtained in
Q31: Additional support for excluding evidence seized in
Q32: The rule of law that prohibits the
Q33: Supreme Court rulings that exclude evidence for
Q35: The Fourth Amendment to the United States
Q36: When a search is made incident to
Q37: When an officer saw a woman driving
Q38: A suspect may waive his or her
Q39: An exception to the rule that a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents