In considering the admissibility of testimony relating to out-of-court tests made from saliva samples that the defendant was required to give to the investigators, courts have generally held that:
A) this evidence is inadmissible because it violates self-incrimination provisions.
B) such evidence is inadmissible because it violates the best evidence test.
C) the privilege against self-incrimination offers no protection against the use of such evidence.
D) evidence is not admissible if the test was made out of court, but is admissible if the test is made in court and warnings have been given.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q15: In People v. Wilkinson, the defendant wanted
Q16: In the City of Cleveland Heights v.
Q17: In the case of Commonwealth v. Gaynor,
Q18: Evidence that is the result of examinations
Q19: The courts have established rules concerning the
Q21: In considering the use of results of
Q22: Several courts have considered the use of
Q23: Implied consent statutes providing for revocation of
Q24: Blood tests often serve the useful purpose
Q25: In recent years, the courts have reexamined
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents