In Considering the Use of Results of Blood, Urine, and Breath

In considering the use of results of blood, urine, and breath tests to determine intoxication, and comments by the prosecutor concerning a defendant's refusal to take the test, the United States Supreme Court has determined that:

A) requiring the taking of such tests does not violate self-incrimination rights, but comments by the prosecutor on the failure to take the test violate self-incrimination rights.
B) the extraction of blood samples for such tests does not violate the self-incrimination rights of the person but does violate the right to counsel protection.
C) a state statute allowing the introduction of evidence of refusal to take the test violates self-incrimination provisions.
D) neither the extraction of blood samples for blood-alcohol tests nor comments by the prosecutor on refusal to take the test violates self-incrimination protections.