When considering evidence of conduct of the accused shortly before the offense, the courts have held that:
A) such evidence is not admissible.
B) evidence of circumstances preceding the crime may be relevant, but the prejudicial value of the evidence outweighs any probative value since even defendants have rights to privacy.
C) the evidence is generally admissible if inconsistent with the accused's innocence and is probative of guilt.
D) it is not admissible when offered by the prosecution, but is admissible when offered by the defense.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: According to the Federal Rules, evidence, although
Q23: Where an objection to the admission of
Q24: In some situations, logically relevant evidence can
Q25: Generally, physical or photographic evidence that tends
Q26: An alleged victim has made an identification
Q28: Assume that a defendant had told several
Q29: Instructions by the court that the jury
Q30: Evidence offered by the defense as to
Q31: Assume that a defendant had voluntarily consumed
Q32: The general rule regarding character evidence is
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents