Assume that a defendant had told several persons that he was going to kill Wanda and the witnesses observed him sharpening a hunting knife that he said was going to be used to kill Wanda. Assume that Wanda's body was discovered near the defendant's home with stab wounds. The people who heard the defendant's threats and saw him sharpening the knife could:
A) not testify concerning the defendant's earlier statements because that would be constitutionally suspect because he has a right not to incriminate himself.
B) not testify against the defendant because the prejudicial value of the evidence outweighs any probative value because no one can know what the defendant was really thinking.
C) testify against the defendant because circumstances preceding a criminal act are usually considered relevant and admissible to demonstrate what a defendant did or said.
D) not be permitted to testify because this kind of evidence is not relevant when offered by the prosecution.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Where an objection to the admission of
Q24: In some situations, logically relevant evidence can
Q25: Generally, physical or photographic evidence that tends
Q26: An alleged victim has made an identification
Q27: When considering evidence of conduct of the
Q29: Instructions by the court that the jury
Q30: Evidence offered by the defense as to
Q31: Assume that a defendant had voluntarily consumed
Q32: The general rule regarding character evidence is
Q33: In a criminal prosecution, the prosecutor has
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents