Assume that a defendant had voluntarily consumed a large quantity of alcohol to the point of extreme intoxication and was alleged to have committed a criminal act. Evidence concerning voluntary intoxication of the accused at the time of the crime:
A) is never admissible because a defendant may not rely on intoxication to prove his lack of guilt.
B) is admissible because voluntary intoxication is an excuse for the commission of a crime.
C) is not admissible because all states have statutes prohibiting the use of such evidence.
D) may be admissible if the purpose is to demonstrate that a particular state of mind required for guilt of the charged crime could not have existed due to the level of intoxication.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: An alleged victim has made an identification
Q27: When considering evidence of conduct of the
Q28: Assume that a defendant had told several
Q29: Instructions by the court that the jury
Q30: Evidence offered by the defense as to
Q32: The general rule regarding character evidence is
Q33: In a criminal prosecution, the prosecutor has
Q34: As a general rule, evidence relating to
Q35: The prosecution in Commonwealth v. Prashaw had
Q36: In State v. Jackson, in a sexual
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents