Write an essay critically examining the following claim: "Something is good for us only if it satisfies our desires." Are there any cases in which we can be benefited without having any of our desires satisfied? Present a couple of cases that might be thought to have this feature, and describe how you think a desire satisfaction theorist would respond.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is The claim that "something is good for us only if it satisfies our desires" is a contentious one that has been debated by philosophers for centuries. This claim is rooted in the desire satisfaction theory, which posits that the ultimate good for an individual is the satisfaction of their desires. However, there are cases in which we can be benefited without having any of our desires satisfied.

One such case is the example of a patient who is unconscious and in critical condition. In this scenario, the patient may not have any desires being satisfied, yet they are benefiting from medical treatment that is aimed at saving their life. Another example is that of a child who is forced to undergo a painful but life-saving medical procedure. In this case, the child's desires for comfort and freedom from pain are not being satisfied, yet they are clearly benefiting from the procedure.

A desire satisfaction theorist would likely respond to these cases by arguing that the ultimate goal of these actions is to ultimately satisfy the desires of the individual. In the case of the unconscious patient, the desire satisfaction theorist might argue that the ultimate desire of the patient is to continue living, and the medical treatment is aimed at fulfilling this desire. Similarly, in the case of the child undergoing a painful procedure, the desire satisfaction theorist might argue that the ultimate desire of the child is to be healthy and free from illness, and the procedure is aimed at fulfilling this desire.

However, critics of the desire satisfaction theory may argue that there are instances in which individuals can be benefited without their desires being satisfied. For example, a person may benefit from an act of kindness or generosity from a stranger, even if they did not desire or expect it. In these cases, it can be argued that the individual is benefiting from something that they did not desire or anticipate, which challenges the claim that something is only good for us if it satisfies our desires.

In conclusion, while the desire satisfaction theory provides a compelling framework for understanding what is good for us, there are cases in which individuals can be benefited without their desires being satisfied. It is important to consider these cases and engage in critical examination of the claim that something is good for us only if it satisfies our desires.

Write an Essay Critically Examining the Following Claim: "Something Is