Ford contended that it could not be charged with reckless homicide because the statute violated the ex post facto clause of both the State of Indiana and the U.S. Constitution. What type of argument was Ford making?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Ford was making a constitutional argument, specifically related to the ex post facto clause of both the State of Indiana and the U.S. Constitution. This clause prohibits laws from being applied retroactively in criminal cases.

Ford Contended That It Could Not Be Charged with Reckless