In its attempt to quash its indictment, Ford argued that ex post facto considerations prevented it from being prosecuted. What did Ford mean by this?
A) individual executives, but not a corporation can be tried under Indiana law
B) after Ford had met all existing federal regulatory standards in making the Pinto, a state like Indiana could not then come along at a later date and prosecute the company
C) the conduct for which Ford was indicted (making the Pinto) occurred before the legal statute being used to prosecute the company was passed and made law by the Indiana legislature
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Before the Ford Pinto case, it was
Q2: Which of the following is not true
Q3: "Since Ford is not a living human
Q4: Which of the following was the first
Q5: Ford contended that it could not be
Q7: Ford argued that the state of Indiana
Q8: Which of the following is true regarding
Q9: What is the purpose of allocating "punitive"
Q10: Cosentino sought to have the case brought
Q11: Judge Jones ruled:
A) in favor of Ford's
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents