Ford argued that the state of Indiana should not be able to bring criminal charges against the company because Ford conducts interstate commerce and is regulated by the federal government. That is, Ford argued that its indictment should be quashed because federal regulatory standards should preempt state criminal law. In making this statement, what kind of argument was Ford proposing?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Ford's argument is based on the constitutional principle of federal preemption, which holds that federal law supersedes state law in certain circumstances. In this case, Ford is arguing that federal regulations governing its business should take precedence over Indiana's criminal law.

Ford Argued That the State of Indiana Should Not Be