In New York v. Burger, a junkyard owner claimed that a New York statute permitting warrantless searches of junkyards was a violation of the 4th Amendment. The Supreme Court held that the statute was:
A) constitutional because the Fourth Amendment applies only to real persons, not businesses
B) constitutional because to hold otherwise would leave the Commerce Clause meaningless when regulation is "clearly necessary"
C) unconstitutional because it was applied in a discriminatory manner
D) an unconstitutional violation of the exclusionary rule
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q353: Warrentless searches:
A) are not allowed under any
Q354: The Fifth Amendment:
A) protects corporate executives from
Q355: The Supreme Court held that warrantless searches
Q356: The Fifth Amendment protects individuals against:
A) illegal
Q357: In Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Assn.,
Q359: In Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Assn.,
Q360: Based on the Fourth Amendment, the exclusionary
Q361: In Braswell v. U.S., the president and
Q362: In Braswell v. U.S., the president and
Q363: Government agents may monitor online chat rooms
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents