A county adopted a flexible affirmative action program with no specific quotas, but with the purpose of getting more women in certain positions in which there were no women. To accomplish its goal, the County hired a qualified woman instead of a man who had scored higher on a valid aptitude test. The man sued arguing the program was discriminatory. The Supreme Court held that this action was:
A) illegal because of reverse sex discrimination
B) legal if the county could demonstrate that the woman was better qualified than the man
C) legal only if the county adopted a program with specific clearly specified quotas
D) illegal because the affirmative action program had not been approved by the EEOC
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q407: Recently, voluntary affirmative action programs:
A) have declined
Q408: A county adopted a flexible affirmative action
Q409: The _ provides protection for disabled persons
Q410: The _ provides protection for disabled persons
Q411: In U.S. v. Paradise, involving the hiring
Q413: In U.S. v. Paradise, involving the hiring
Q414: The employment rights of persons with disabilities
Q415: In general, employment discrimination laws in Europe
Q416: Japan's first sexual harassment case:
A) occurred long
Q417: All companies with federal contracts of $2,500
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents