In Babbitt V

In Babbitt v. Sweet Home, involving logging of areas where the spotted owl nested, the Supreme Court held that the:

A) northern spotted owl was no longer an endangered species
B) habitat protection is a key part of the specie protection
C) Secretary of Interior overstepped his authority in defining harm as habitat destruction
D) authority to regulate the habitat of the northern spotted owl belonged to the EPA, not the Department of Interior
E) northern spotted owl's habitat did not satisfy cost-benefit calculations