Solved

In in Re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing, the Listing

Question 455

Multiple Choice

In In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing, the listing of the polar bear as a threatened specie was challenged. It is not endangered today but could be in the future. The listing by the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) was attacked as arbitrary and capricious. The appeals court held that:


A) courts may not review decisions of the FWS regarding such listings
B) the listing was proper as FWS showed that the bear is in "imminent danger" of survival
C) the listing was improper because the FWS failed to show that its survival was in danger unless very strange assumptions were made
D) the listing was arbitrary and capricious as the FWS failed to justify its decision based on scientific evidence
E) none of the other choices

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents