Jurors hearing a malpractice suit in a Tarasoff case know the plaintiff has been injured.
A) It doesn't matter because the hindsight bias is weak and easily overcome by instruction
B) The jurors may be less sympathetic to the plaintiff because they attribute responsibility to an injured person for his or her injury
C) It doesn't matter because a good lawyer can make a strong defense
D) It may create a hindsight bias with the juror more willing to attribute negligence to the defendant therapist simply because of the knowledge that an injury had occurred.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q37: Bounty hunters
A) have to observe individual rights
Q38: Because bail bondspersons who provide bail bonds
Q39: The Tarasoff case was a malpractice suit,
Q40: The Tarasoff duty as the California Supreme
Q41: The Tarasoff decision revealed a difference in
Q42: Mental health professionals were concerned that the
Q43: A majority of mental health professionals
A) agreed
Q44: Under Tarasoff, mental health professionals have a
Q45: Under Tarasoff, mental health professionals have a
Q46: Giving a potential victim a warning
A) was
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents