Which of the following accurately describes a difference between de jure and de facto segregation/discrimination in the United States?
A) De jure segregation/discrimination is now fairly rare; de facto segregation/discrimination is now fairly common.
B) De jure segregation/discrimination is generally constitutional; de facto segregation/discrimination is generally unconstitutional.
C) De jure segregation/discrimination is fairly common now; de facto segregation/discrimination was fairly common during the civil rights movement.
D) De jure segregation/discrimination currently exists by race; de facto segregation/discrimination currently exists by gender.
E) De jure segregation/discrimination is prohibited by the Constitution; de facto segregation/discrimination is prohibited by law.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q45: Why did Congress pass the Voting Rights
Q46: How are the Fourteenth Amendment and the
Q47: Which of the following affirmative action programs
Q48: Which of the following is an example
Q49: What was the Supreme Court's justification for
Q51: Which of the following best describes the
Q52: Of the following people, who could serve
Q53: Who of the following would be the
Q54: Although laws and courts have prohibited age
Q55: How does the strict scrutiny applied by
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents