What was the rationale for rejecting the claim that the federal government needed to abolish Jim Crow laws because they conflicted with the equal protection clause?
A) The federal government should not interfere in states' rights to determine their own equal protection laws and should not practice social engineering.
B) The federal government should leave the decision up to each state because in some states Jim Crow laws were important for maintaining social order.
C) Jim Crow laws helped African Americans achieve equality by building character through overcoming adversity, so to declare them a violation of equal protection would be counterproductive.
D) The equal protection clause applied only to the actions of the federal government, so states were within their rights to enact Jim Crow laws.
E) The equal protection clause referred only to social equality, not legal or political equality, so the federal government should not make equal protection a legal or political issue.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q51: Which of the following best describes the
Q52: Of the following people, who could serve
Q53: Who of the following would be the
Q54: Although laws and courts have prohibited age
Q55: How does the strict scrutiny applied by
Q57: Which of the following situations would most
Q58: Why did southern states enact poll taxes?
A)
Q59: If you thought you were getting an
Q60: Which of the following laws would be
Q61: _ upheld the right of private individuals-but
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents