In Lewis V

In Lewis v. Heartland Inns of America, L.L.C., where Lewis sued for violation of her Title VII rights, contending that she was fired for not conforming to sex stereotypes and in retaliation for opposing discriminatory practices, the appeals court held that:

A) Heartland's proffered reason for Lewis's termination was pretextual and the district court's ruling for Heartland should be reversed
B) Heartland's proffered reason for Lewis's termination was not pretextual and the district court's ruling against Heartland should be reversed
C) Heartland's proffered reason for Lewis's termination was not pretextual and the district court's ruling for Heartland should be reversed
D) Heartland's proffered reason for Lewis's termination was sufficient explanation for her termination
E) Lewis could not sue for sex discrimination since the person who fired her was also a woman