In Responsible Economic Development V

In Responsible Economic Development v.S.C.Dept.of Health and Enviro.Control,where the state gave Wal-Mart a permit for storm water runoff into a creek,and an environment group challenged the permit as inadequate as it would pollute various bodies of water,the South Carolina high court held that:

A) a construction site qualified as a protected wetland,so Wal-Mart would also need a permit from the Army Corps
B) the runoff would go into an endangered marsh area,so an evaluation would have to be made by the Fish and Wildlife Service
C) the permit process met the standards required,so the permit stands
D) the permit process was arbitrary and capricious,so it would have to be reconsidered
E) none of the other choices