In Responsible Economic Development V

In Responsible Economic Development v.S.C.Dept.of Health and Enviro.Control,where the state gave Wal-Mart a permit for storm water runoff into a creek,and an environment group challenged the permit as inadequate as it would pollute various bodies of water,the South Carolina high court:

A) upheld the permit based on the evidence that the storm water runoff from the parking lot would not adversely affect the body of water in question
B) struck down the permit based on the lack of evidence that the storm water runoff from the parking lot would not adversely affect the body of water in question
C) issued an injunction to prevent construction based on the lack of evidence that the storm water runoff from the parking lot would not adversely affect the body of water in question
D) fined Wal-Mart for not conducting a thorough environmental impact study
E) passed the case on to the Supreme Court