In Responsible Economic Development V

In Responsible Economic Development v.S.C.Dept.of Health and Enviro.Control,where the state gave Wal-Mart a permit for storm water runoff into a creek,and an environment group challenged the permit as inadequate as it would pollute various bodies of water,the South Carolina high court held that:

A) a construction site qualified as a protected wetland,so Wal-Mart would also need a permit from the Army Corps
B) the runoff would go into an endangered marsh area,so an evaluation would have to be made by the Fish and Wildlife Service
C) the permit process failed to comply with the Stormwater Management and Sediment Reduction Act,so the process would have to be revised before reconsidering Wal-Mart's permit request
D) the permit process was arbitrary and capricious,as it was rubber stamp,so it would have to be reconsidered
E) none of the other choices