No consensus exists on how the courts should punish the guilty, perhaps due to the fact that five different philosophical principles guide sentencing in the United States: retribution, incapacitation, deterrence, rehabilitation, and restoration. These sentencing philosophies differ in important ways. Some focus on past behavior, whereas others are future-oriented. Some stress that the punishment should fit the crime, whereas others emphasize that punishment should fit the criminal. These issues influence contemporary thinking about sentencing.

-Which sentencing philosophy encompasses the idea that offenders deserve punishment?

Question

-Which sentencing philosophy encompasses the idea that offenders deserve punishment?

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Retribution is a sentencing philosophy that emphasizes that offenders deserve punishment for their crimes. This philosophy is based on the idea of "an eye for an eye," meaning that criminals should receive punishment that is proportionate to the harm they have caused. This approach is often seen as a way to ensure that offenders are held accountable for their actions and that justice is served.

No Consensus Exists on How the Courts Should Punish the Guilty