Sharon,a white female,and James,a black male,who work at the NewThings Mart as cashiers decide to steal some bottles of beer.Sharon watches the front of the store,while James loads the beer into his truck from the store's inventory room.Neither of them was aware of the security cameras in the store.The owner,being notified of the theft by the security guard,terminates Sharon and gives James a written warning.Which of the following holds true in this scenario?
A) Sharon has no cause of action because she is an at-will employee.
B) Sharon has no cause of action because she does not belong to a protected class.
C) Sharon has a cause of action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because the act applies equally to all.
D) Sharon has a cause of action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for retaliatory discharge.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Which of the following is the first
Q5: In 2008,the U.S.House of Representatives passed a
Q6: Under reverse race discrimination,the ultimate burden of
Q7: Martha,a black woman,had been working as an
Q12: The Voting Rights Act of 1965 gave
Q12: Discrimination against an individual based on perception
Q13: Brett,the manager at Warson's Diner,plans to promote
Q18: An English-only rule may be used at
Q19: The only time that a discussion of
Q20: Before the Civil Rights Act of 1964,the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents