Brett,the manager at Warson's Diner,plans to promote Keisha,one of the waitresses,to the position of an assistant manager.However,the owner,being racially biased,prevents him from doing so.Later,when Brett wants to promote one of the delivery boys to waiter,the owner again vetoes his recommendation on the grounds that his customers would feel uncomfortable having a black man deliver their food.Brett,extremely frustrated,offers Keisha and the delivery boy their promotions as he finds them deserving.Subsequently,Brett gets fired.Which of the following holds true in this scenario?
A) Brett has a cause of action against Warson's Diner for retaliatory discharge under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
B) Brett has a cause of action against Warson's Diner based on the bona fide occupational qualification defense.
C) Brett is liable for racial discrimination because as a manager he failed to change the company's policy regarding promotion of African-Americans.
D) Brett is liable because he failed to follow the instructions provided by his employer.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: In 2008,the U.S.House of Representatives passed a
Q9: Sharon,a white female,and James,a black male,who work
Q9: Title VII's (of the Civil Rights Act
Q12: Discrimination against an individual based on perception
Q12: The Voting Rights Act of 1965 gave
Q15: Lighter-toned Hispanics,East Asians,and Asians,among others,all have experienced
Q17: Actions for racial harassment,unlike those of race
Q18: An English-only rule may be used at
Q18: A five-year,seven-volume study by the Russell Sage
Q20: Before the Civil Rights Act of 1964,the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents