Nebusa Inc.is a consulting firm.Sam and Arnie are analysts for Nebusa.Sam was hired as an employee,and Arnie was hired as an independent contractor.They both work five days a week during standard business hours in the same Nebusa office and under the same supervisor.Both almost share the same job responsibilities.Sam is paid a salary and the required federal and state tax withholdings are also made by the company.In contrast,Arnie is paid by the project with no federal and state withholdings and does not even receive benefits such as retirement and health insurance.Which of the following is an implication of this scenario?
A) Nebusa has properly classified Arnie as an independent contractor.
B) Nebusa has willfully misclassified Arnie as an independent contractor and is liable under Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
C) Nebusa has no rights to withhold federal and state taxes for Sam if he is classified as a full-time employee.
D) Nebusa has to provide more health and retirement benefits to Arnie than Sam because Arnie is an independent contractor.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Arber Systems Inc.solicits bids from various independent
Q2: A willful misclassification of workers by an
Q3: In an employment-agency relationship,if an agent acts
Q6: The Food Cult Restaurant (FCR)employs part-time workers
Q7: Under the economic realities test,courts consider whether
Q8: The law relating to the employment relationship
Q10: The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 applies to
Q11: The Civil Rights Act of 1866 applies
Q14: The National Labor Relations Act of 1935
Q16: An employer has vicarious liability if an
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents