Price Discrimination. Metropolitan bus service companies in the United States have charged lower fares to senior citizens in an effort to profitably segment the market for their services. Thus, senior citizens have come to enjoy discounts of 25-50% off the prices paid by other (younger) full-price customers. This two-tier pricing scheme has raised the ire of some consumers who view it as discriminatory and a violation of antitrust laws.
A. Is this pricing scheme discriminatory in the economic sense? What conditions would be necessary for it to be profitable to the bus service industry?
B. Carefully describe how price discrimination could violate U.S. antitrust laws and be sure to mention which laws in particular might be violated.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q35: To the extent that costs exceed benefits,
Q36: Price/Output Determination. Tallahassee Cars Unlimited, Inc., a
Q37: Monopoly Equilibrium. Paradox Dental, Ltd., enjoys a
Q38: The F.T.C. enforces antitrust laws by:
A) sentencing
Q39: Monopoly Equilibrium. The Athletic Medicine Center in
Q41: Tariffs. The Nippon Switch Corporation is an
Q42: Pollution Regulation. Blue Gem, Inc., processes almonds
Q43: Costs of Regulation. Biosystems Technology, Inc., manufacturers
Q44: Monopoly Regulation. The Hoosier Gas Company, a
Q45: Monopoly Regulation. The Black Hills Telephone Company,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents