The decision in Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd (1994) 68 ALR 331 was based on the fact that:
A) The landlord of the premises allowed a dangerous substance to escape and damage another's property.
B) The landlord of the premises employed a contractor enter and carry out a dangerous activity.
C) The tenant employed a contractor who was negligent.
D) The landlord failed to have premises properly inspected.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Who is the 'occupier' of premises?
A) The
Q3: To establish a case of occupier's liability,
Q4: Occupiers never owe a trespasser a duty
Q5: A 'non-delegable' duty of care is:
A) Less
Q6: In which case did the House of
Q9: It is easier to take action against
Q10: In Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936]
Q14: Following the decision in Esanda Finance Corporation
Q26: Under common law,an occupier owes a duty
Q35: Which of the following is NOT a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents